In MOOCs’ relatively short five year history, two distinct
types of MOOCs have developed, cMOOCs and xMOOCs. While both types of MOOCs adhere to the
concept of a massive open online course, the pedagogy and learning theory
driving the course create a completely different learner experience. George Seimens (2012), one of the developers of
the connectivist theory from which the c in cMOOCs is derived, illustrates the
core of this difference in the statement, “cMOOCs focus on knowledge creation
and generation whereas xMOOCs focus on knowledge duplication.”
xMOOCs are the courses that have been getting much media
buzz, including those offered from Coursera, Udacity, and EDx. These courses are adapted from traditional college
courses, relying on methods such as video lectures, quizzes, and tests to gauge
learning (Siemens, 2012). They are often
taught by leaders in a field, and contained within a learning management
system. This format, with lack of
collaboration and integration among students with one another and instructors,
begets the overarching criticism of these courses, (Siemens, 2012; Morris, 2012).
In contrast to the portrayal of xMOOCs as “drill and grill” instruction,
Coursera co-founder Daphne Koller (2012), details a number of innovations in
online learning actively being used at Coursera, including interactive videos
which require learner participation, study groups, peer grading, and learner
collaboration in a message board where questions were answered and help
provided nearly any hour of the day due to the worldwide student base.
While xMOOCs may be making strides in areas of
collaboration, it is the underlying theory of learning that fundamentally separates
them from cMOOCs. The cMOOC model
springs from the ideas of connectivism, that learning happens through
connections. They emphasize “creation,
creativity, autonomy, and social networked learning,” (Siemens, 2012). In these courses, there is much less of a
power differential between instructor and learner, focusing on co-learning
instead. The learners engage with one
another, often in real time through various social media. The courses are not self contained within an
LMS. The concept of a cMOOC is brought
to life in this video, albeit a little hard to understand, Visualizing a cMOOC.
While I am only beginning to participate in an xMOOC, I am
intrigued by the concept of the cMOOC and the completely different approach to
learning. In the future I would like to
explore a cMOOC course to compare and contrast the styles. So far, two weeks into my Coursera course, I
am finding the format of short videos and quizzes to be both interesting (where
I have made enough meaning from my new knowledge to chatter about ideas to
coworkers), and conducive to my schedule.
The “c” in the cMOOC actually scares me a little! I have made one post on the Coursera message
board and been inundated with updates and emails. I’m not sure I am prepared to collaborate in
real time with thousands of people.
References
Morris, S. M. (2012). Broadcast Education: A response to
Coursera. Open Education. Retrieved from http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/Journal/files/Broadcast_Education.html
Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform.
Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/
Koller, D. (2012, June). Daphne Koller: What we're learning
from online education [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_education.html
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Jennifer,
DeleteDo you think it is efficient to interact with people without a teacher? I think, by now, Moocs can just be a complement for higher education because teachers are so few online. Without teachers, interaction among various students are just like conversations in bars.
Landay, personally I think there is a place for guided instruction from a teacher, even within a MOOC, but I do think students can learn a lot from each other also.
DeleteHi Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your thoughts on the difference between xmoocs and cmoocs! I think you've made some nice distinctions between the delivery (meaning company vs university) as well as the theoretical differences. I do wonder whether there is some blurring going on in the learning theory distinction. Will be interesting to see how it plays out. I also loved your comment about being scared of the "c". I totally get that! I does seem like it could be a bit much! But some folks do seem to love that! Look forward to future discussions....
The collaboration is what I'm interested in, in the cMOOC. While the collaboration is meant to enhance the learning process, I think it can be overwhelming if one is not use to it.
ReplyDeleteCompleting both type of MOOCs will give a better insight as to how each work. As you stated, one can compare and contrast them. Personally, I would like to see one course developed as an xMOOC and a cMOOC. And then compare the differences between the two and see which students thought were more valuable and engaging.
Great idea Tasha!
DeleteHi Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteI wondered if the cMOOC would be disruptive in the number of contacts of notice with so many online. I can see Landay's point of how a discussion board with so many participating possibly becoming more social if faculty guidance/moderation is at a minimum. That would be the challenge if college credit enters into the picture. What changes will occur with the discussion and peer review aspect, if any?